Proya's net profit surge relies on a 445 million yuan M&A trick, while non-recurring profit fell 13.8%. The 53% marketing expense ratio exposes a traffic dependency crisis.
Image uploading...
When Proya, the top Chinese domestic beauty stock, delivered its 2026 semi-annual report showing net profit attributable to shareholders soaring 46.3% year-on-year to 1.168 billion yuan, the secondary market could easily reach the optimistic conclusion that domestic beauty brands are surging against the cycle if it only looks at this glossy cover. However, as soon as one shifts one's gaze to the real bottom line — net profit attributable to shareholders after deducting non-recurring gains and losses plunging 13.8% year-on-year to 664 million yuan — and combines that with a selling expense ratio as high as 53.13%, it becomes clear: this seemingly dazzling earnings surge is essentially an accounting-based paper prosperity packaged through a surprise controlling-stake consolidation. It not only fails to conceal the stagnant growth of the core business, but also drags into full view the deep-seated pain of a domestic leader mired in the quagmire of traffic-buying, caught in diminishing marginal returns.
The Physical Ceiling of the Traffic Leverage: Revenue Barely Grows, Core Brand Shows Decline for the First Time
Over the past few years, Proya leveraged the consumer mindshare of its hero products built around the "morning Vitamin C, evening Vitamin A" routine, an extremely keen capture of e-commerce dividends, and aggressive information-feed advertising to defeat a host of foreign giants and domestic rivals, forcefully ascending to the throne of domestic beauty revenue. But this explosive model, built by maxing out traffic leverage, is now hitting the most severe physical ceiling. First-half total revenue was 5.375 billion yuan, up just 0.24% year-on-year, essentially marking time.
Against a backdrop of near-zero revenue growth, the core brand that anchors the fundamental base showed decline for the first time, and to sustain this 5.3 billion yuan in volume, the company burned through a full 2.856 billion yuan in selling expenses in the first half — equivalent to handing over more than 53 yuan to the traffic bidding pools of major e-commerce platforms and top livestreamers for every 100 yuan of revenue earned.
The Capital Foundation: A Decade of Maneuvering from Single-Brand Operation to Industrial Holding Platform
Tracing the evolution of the underlying assets to penetrate this market-cap giant's capital foundation, its nearly decade-long maneuvering in the A-share market is laid bare in corporate registration records. Corporate registration data shows that Proya Cosmetics Co., Ltd. was established in May 2006, with founder Hou Juncheng as its legal representative, registered capital of approximately 396 million yuan, and it completed its A-share listing as early as 2017.
In the investment map of past years penetrated through corporate registration data, Proya gradually evolved from early single-brand operation into an industrial holding platform spanning color cosmetics, washing and care, raw material R&D, and incubation of emerging brands.
It is precisely this maneuvering from a single brand toward group-style multi-brand M&A that created the biggest profit illusion in this semi-annual report.
The 445 Million Yuan M&A Accounting Trick: Flower Knows Consolidation Creates a Profit Illusion
The core driver behind the more than 300 million yuan in additional profit on the book was the formal inclusion of emerging color cosmetics brand Flower Knows into the consolidated financial statements in June. Under the accounting standard's measurement rules for "step acquisitions achieving a business combination not under common control through multiple transactions," the previously held equity was remeasured at fair value on the acquisition date, directly recognizing a one-time investment gain of up to 445 million yuan out of thin air in the current period.
This non-recurring gain did not come from real cash flow from skincare product sales, but was purely a paper revaluation technical operation. Once this accounting maneuver is stripped away, Proya's true operating profit from its core business not only failed to grow, but under the ruthless erosion of selling expenses, suffered a bleeding regression of nearly 14%.
The 53% Marketing Death Line: Over 2.8 Billion Yuan in Marketing Spend Is More Than Twenty Times R&D Investment
The core culprit behind the sharp drop in profit after deducting non-recurring items lies in the absolute hostage-taking of the company's profit center by its marketing addiction.
When the selling expense ratio breaches the high-risk warning line of 50%, it means the so-called product repurchase moat the brand previously built becomes extremely fragile in the face of algorithms. The overall domestic beauty consumption market is moving toward rationality and restraint, and the peaking of online public-domain traffic has sent platform bidding costs soaring wildly. To hold onto top exposure positions on the shelves, Proya has had to continuously increase spending on self-operated livestream traffic, influencer commissions, and all-network seeding fees.
The more brutal contrast is that R&D investment in the same period hovered only around 100 million yuan, with the R&D expense ratio even below 2% of revenue. Over 2.8 billion yuan in marketing spend is more than twenty times the R&D investment in the same period. This extremely imbalanced resource allocation directly hollows out the possibility of building a deep moat in raw material synthesis and formula patents, reducing the company to a brick-hauler working for internet traffic platforms.
Flower Knows Consolidation Cannot Solve the Long-Term Dilemma: Greater Cyclical Volatility in Color Cosmetics and Even Heavier Reliance on Marketing
While the consolidation of Flower Knows can certainly inject a shot in the arm for second-half revenue, the color cosmetics category itself has stronger cyclical volatility and shorter product lifecycles, and its reliance on visual marketing and co-branded hype is even greater than that of skincare. If Proya cannot form substantive technological empowerment in its mid- and back-end supply chain and R&D, merely piecing together revenue figures through acquisitions of emerging brands will only push the group's overall selling expense ratio further toward the brink of losing control.
Conclusion: M&A Gains Can Only Whitewash One Reporting Period; the Traffic Addiction Must Ultimately Be Self-Detoxified
This profit face-change in the midsummer earnings season sounds an alarm for the entire domestic consumer goods sector. The first-generation dividend built on precise ad buying and hero-product bombardment has been completely exhausted, and M&A gains under accounting standards can ultimately only whitewash one reporting period. When the tide recedes, if one cannot self-detoxify from the marketing addiction of heavy reliance on traffic purchasing, and cannot build a spontaneous growth capability independent of paid traffic within a genuine underlying R&D base and a pool of high-repurchase consumers, then even an industry leader wearing a crown may at any time swallow the bitter fruit it planted itself in a losing battle of traffic slaughter.